Stay informed with free updates
Simply sign up at UK employment Myft Digest – delivered directly to your box.
The United Kingdom Government must strengthen its reforms in workers’ rights to ensure that “deceitful employers” cannot use gaps in the legislation, an Inter-Party Committee of MPs said on Monday.
The current package, because it leaves the main details to be placed in the later regulation, “undermines the assurance that reforms intend to reach” and puts parliament “at risk of signing an empty regulatory control”, warned the Business and Trade Committee.
Specifically, ministers had to be clearer of the law on exactly how a prohibition of zero hours would work, and ensure that all employees qualify for new rights for regular work hours and compensation when the shifts were canceled. There should also be more details on the new rights for unions to organize, he added.
The Committee also called for the government to accelerate workers’ status reforms-a measure intended to prevent false self-employment, which is not included in the bill at the moment, and said clear plans were needed to fund the new labor agency that will implement the rights of workers.
Ministers this week will publish changes in the Draft Law on Employment Rights before the next phase of the parliamentary process.
Business groups have been lobbying a lot for changes to mitigate the impact of legislation – which includes a comprehensive group of reforms designed to give workers more safety and increase the role of trade unions.
“We know that business is concerned about increasing employment costs,” said Liam Byrne Labor Chairman. “But we have also received evidence of the abuse of workers who have sincerely terrified us.”
The Committee said it had received evidence from McDonald’s after new claims of sexual behavior were displayed in its work strength; had received a number of complaints about poor working practices from couriers to the Delivery Company Evri; And he heard how the Frasers Group’s direct sports chain had abandoned previous promises to reduce his confidence in agency workers.
Calling the Committee for a stricter approach contradicts the demands of employers, who worry that their warnings about the possible costs of legislation – coming to the forefront of immediate tax increases and minimum wage – are falling on deaf ears.
Government figures have previously signaled that they plan to make some changes to the -law to address practical concerns – for example, to ensure that large employers did not have to constantly consult workers for surpluses in different countries unless they were related.
But trade unions are increasingly secure than reform substance – including the introduction of the first day protection against unfair rest, a stalemate of using “fire and reopening” to reduce employment contracts, and the involvement of agency employees in prohibition of zero hours – will remain intact.
Lobbyists have asked ministers to resist the call to establish measures in greater detail now.
Matthew Percival, director of the future of work at CBI, said businesses wanted to “avoid closing in detail.. This can be better set by a proper dialogue”, adding that “postpone these details in secondary legislation can create time to identify compromises”.
Neil Carberry, chief executive of the recruitment and employment confederation, who represents the agencies, said the government should “take time to speak and take things properly” instead of moving forward with a default with trade unions that were “short in detail and long in potential economic damage”.
Evri said he was “proud” to offer his couriers of self-employment with “greater protection and benefits”, including pensions, vacations and salaries of the patients, adding that the couriers had many ways to raise concerns that would be investigated.
McDonald’s said he had “undertaken wide jobs over the past year to ensure that we have industry leadership practices to support” security, and that “any incident of improper behavior and harassment is unacceptable and subject to fast and complete action”.
The Frasers Group refused to comment.
Additional report by Anna Gross and Madeleine Speed
