New York Times has officially submitted a motion to dismiss from work Justin Baldon’s $ 250 million lawsuits.
By termThe outlet presented a motion in a Federal Court of New York on Friday, February 28, defending its reporting on Blake Lively’s Charges against Baldon, 40 years old, in the group of Ends with us And looking now be removed from the lawsuit.
New York Times He is arguing that reporting and collecting their news in his article “We can bury anyone: inside a stained machinery in Hollywood”, which detailed Lively’s sexual harassment claims against Baldon was fair and accurate. In Friday court’s submission, now accused Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios for making “one -sided” accounts of their altercation against Lively that should not include now
“FAC of Wayfarer parties tells a one -sided tale that has won many titles,” now Court registration is read. But Times does not belong to this dispute. “
In a statement to The weekly Friday, February 28, New York Times doubled in her move to rest.
“As our movement shows, this issue should have never been brought against New York Times”Said a spokesman we. “Blake Lively raised serious concerns about how it was treated in the group and after the film was published. We did exactly what the news organizations should do: we informed the public about the complaint she filed in the California Civil Rights Department. Mr Baldon’s wrong campaign against Times – question our ethics, trying to discredit our reporting, the presentation of an unfounded litigation – it will not be silent. “
Baldon was among 10 plaintiffs, which also includes publicists Melissa Nathan AND Jennifer Abel as well as Ends with us CROP James heath AND Steve Saraowitz, who started legal procedures against New York Times on the eve of the New Year 2024.
The plaintiffs for the slander and conquest of the false light of intimacy and claimed that the publication “Cherry Choose Communications” and the context left to deceive the readers in his article, which was published on December 21. New York Times Their reporting disputes were unfair or incorrect in their motion to rest.
“During the course of their first 224-page complaint (” FAC “) (plus an added 168 pages of time), Wayfarer parties breathe their side of a constant Hollywood drama that includes actors Blake Lively (” Lively “) and Justin Baldon (” Baldon “), film stars” Lively “) and Justin Baldon (” Baldon “), movie stars of film of the movie, Ends with us“The registration of the trial presented on Friday reads. “FAC, to some extent, has achieved its apparent goal; the story of Wayfarer’s parties has been reported by countless newspapers of news in recent weeks. What FAC has not made, however, is to accept a applicable claim against Times”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69ec6/69ec68f6873a2bb4cbcd6a4112eb3805567b7974" alt="New York Times files will be fired by Justin Baldon's lawsuit"
Justin Baldon and Blake Lively.
(Photo by Jose Perez/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images)Following the court’s appearance, said a spokesman for Lively, 37 The weekly that their party agreed that the lawsuit against New York Times should be thrown.
“In his move to rest, New York Times Correctly calls Justin Baldon’s lawsuit for what is: a shameless PR document that has no business in court of law, ”said a living representative we
The spokesman added: “For years, Baldon asked men to hear and believe women. But when a woman talked about his behavior, he and his billionaire’s supporter Steve Sorrowitz Use a combat plan on social media to burn the land and try to ‘bury’ and ‘destroy’ it, along with the media reporting to it. These harassment tactics will not survive in court, and everyone must see their claims without merit for what they are. “
The weekly has reached Baldon’s representatives for comment.
In December after the $ 250 million lawsuit is filed, Baldon’s lawyer Bryan Freedman pledged to “remove” New York Times, describing her reporting as a “bad stain campaign” in a statement to US weekly.
“In this bad campaign of fully orchestrated staining by Blake Lively and her team, the New York Times Related to the wishes and whims of the two powerful ‘untouchable’ elites of Hollywood, ignoring the practices and ethics of journalism once adapting to the honorable publication using doctrinal and manipulated texts and leaving with deliberate texts that oppose their chosen narrative, ”he said in a statement for we at the time. “In doing so, they previously determined the outcome of their history, and helped and descended their destructive Tam campaign to revitalize Lively’s self-escorted public image and oppose the organic basis of criticism between the Internet. The irony is rich.”
He went on: “However, do not make a mistake, as we all come together to go down Ny Times Not allowing them to deceive the public, we will continue this campaign of authenticity by suing even those individuals who have abused their power to prove and destroy the lives of my clients. As their side embraces partial truths, we embrace the full truth – and we have all the communications to support it. The public will decide on its own as it happened when this begins for the first time. “
Baldon has also strongly denied all lively claims, suing her on January 16 along with her husband, Ryan Reynoldsand publicist Leslie Sloane (who has raised a motion to remove himself from the lawsuit) for $ 400 million.