The Supreme Court of the United States in the early Saturday paused President Donald Trump’s government, since they deported the Venezuelan men in immigration custody after their lawyers had announced the risk of a distance without the judicial review previously required by the judges.
“The government is instructed to remove a member of the alleged class class of prisoners from the United States until the further order of this court,” said the judges in a short, unsigned decision.
Conservative judges Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito publicly reflected on the decision, which were published at 12.55 p.m.
The lawyers of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) submitted urgent inquiries, including the Supreme Court, and asked immediate measures after reporting that some of the men had already been invited to buses and were announced that they should be deported.
The ACLU said that the fast developments have led to the administration ready to deport the men with a law of 1798 that was historically only employed in times of war -without offering a realistic opportunity to contest their distance how the Supreme Court was necessary.
The White House did not immediately answer an application for a statement on the decision of the Supreme Court.
View of the constitutional crisis
The case raises questions about compliance with the limits of the Trump government set by the Supreme Court. There is a risk of a significant conflict between the two cooking of government branches and possibly a full -blown constitutional crisis.
Trump was appointed to the law on Alien Enemies from 1798 last year because of the promise to act against migrants, for accused members of Tren de Aragua, a criminal gang that comes from Venezolan prisons, quickly deported that his administration referred to a terrorist group.
The law was last used to detain non -citizens of Japanese, German and Italian descent during the Second World War.
The president and his senior assisted that their executive power grants them broad authority for immigration issues and tested the balance of power between government branches.
During a hearing on Friday, a government lawyer said in a related case that he was not aware of the plans of the Department of Homeland Security to deport the men that day, but there could be deportations on Saturday.
Trump achieved a victory on Friday when an appellate court held a threat to the district judge James Boasberg for contempt.
Boasberg also contested an ACLU application to block Trump before the deportation of alleged members of Tren de Aragua, and quoted a judgment of the Supreme Court on April 7, which enabled Trump to use the Anien Enemies Act, albeit with certain limits.
Boasberg said he was concerned that the government would deport additional people on Saturday, but that: “At that time I just don’t think I have the power to do something about it.”
Trump previously called for Boasberg’s elevation after a negative decision and prompted John Roberts to rare rare reproduction.
While a hearing in front of Boasberg’s court took place, the ACLU worked on a separate route to stop the deportations of the Venezolans held in Texas.
How it happens6:25The President of the USA and El Salvador “Die Nose” at the Supreme Court, says the lawyer
The Supreme Court of the United States has confirmed that the Trump administration has made it easier to return a Maryland man, who was incorrectly deported to El Salvador, but neither of the two presidents of the country seem to be interested in bringing Kilmar Abrego Garcia home. During a visit to the White House on Monday, El Salvador President Nayib Bukele said: “How can I smuggle a terrorist to the United States?” The host Nil Kӧksal spoke to Nicole Hallet, director of the immigrant law clinic at the University of Chicago Law School.
The ACLU lawyers submitted to the Supreme Court after they had not received a quick answer to the US district judge James James Hendrix in Abilene, Texas, in front of the US district judge James Hendrix, and the fifth US appointment in New Orleans to block such deportations.
In the order on Saturday, the Supreme Court invited the administration to submit an answer to the application of the ACLU after the Fifth Circuit Act.
Forms showed men, gang members, says ACLU
The ACLU said that the men were given forms from which it shows that they were classified as members of Tren de Aragua.
It is about whether the Trump administration has fulfilled the standard of the Supreme Court for the provision of the prisoner’s proper procedure before you sent to another country – possibly to the notorious prison in El Salvador, where others are arrested.
On Friday it was unclear how many people might be deported and where they could be taken.
The ACLU submitted a photo of one of the messages to the court.
“They were determined to be a strange enemy who is subject to concern, restraint and distance,” the statement said. The recipient’s name was covered and it was found that the migrant refused to sign it on Friday.
Trump supports the removal of “bad people”
When asked about the planned deportations on Friday, Trump said that he was not familiar with the special case, but added: “If you are bad people, I would certainly authorize him.”
“That’s why I was elected. A judge was not elected,” he said reporters in the White House.
Defenders and Democrats in the congress have urged the government to demonstrate, as they know that the Venezuelan are members of the gang who are active in human trafficking and other crimes in South America, but have a lower US presence.
“We will not announce the details of the fight against terroristism, but we will notice the decision of the Supreme Court,” said Tricia McLaughlin, the deputy secretary for US Homeland Security, in a statement on Friday.
On March 15, the Trump administration deported more than 130 alleged Tren de Aragua members to El Salvador. Many lawyers and family members of the migrants say they are not gang members and have no chance of denying the government’s claim they were.
