Donald Trump’s presidency is 100 days old on Wednesday, and his brave and often controversial policy And legal Problems that arise from the new administration.
Trump’s first presidency between 2017 and 2021 was also characterized by legal disputes compared to previous administrations. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has once sent out a press release that characterized its 400th right of right against this Trump government. In comparison, the ACLU said that the government of George W. Bush had a total of 13 times in its first term.
The Trump administration also uses the shadow -coated or the emergency docked again, in which judges of the Supreme Court are asked to tackle a problem without oral arguments on an accelerated basis. According to the senior judge Steve Vladeck, who wrote a book on this topic, the Trump administration This avenue used much more often In his first term as the Bush, Joe Biden or Barack Obama.
What varies in this Trump presidency is how the White House reacts to only temporary setbacks from judges. According to an ABC news report, the Trump administration was accused of violating commands six times in courtusually in cases of deportations.
In addition, Attorney General Pam Bondi responded to losses with alarmist language, Branding judges who made decisions against the White House as “villain” or “radical”. In the meantime, Trump consultant Stephen Miller was accused by a former Bush Administration lawyer of “roughly misaligned”, a signed arrangement of the Supreme Court In the much published Kilmar Abrego Garcia as a victory for the government when the judgment actually asked to facilitate the return of the deported person to the USA
After US President Donald Trump, his advisor Elon Musk and some Republican legislators called up to complain about the judges due to unfavorable decisions, the Supreme Court of John Robert’s Supreme Court submitted a rare public statement and said that the appeal procedure exists to react to legal differences.
Trump’s comments, officials of the White House and Congress Republicans, who raised the ghost of the judges’ indictment as a result of undesirable decisions in the past three months, led to a rare reproduction of the judge of the Supreme Court of John Roberts.
Here is a look at some of the most important topics and cases that have developed so far.
Boss citizenship
The case of Trump Administration, which is the top priority for oral arguments in front of the Supreme Court, is set for May 15 and concerns an order of the executive to restrict automatic birthday citizenship.
Trump instructed the federal authorities to refuse to recognize citizenship of children born in the United States who do not have at least one parent who is a US citizen or a lawful constant resident.
One of the first executive regulations enacted by US President Donald Trump could have a major impact on Canadians who live and work in the United States, has temporarily hired the command, but this is only the beginning of the legal dispute.
Challengers argued that Trump’s command violates a right that is anchored in the 14th change in the US constitution, which provides that everyone who was born in the United States is a citizen.
If the government prevails, the United States would not necessarily be an outlier among advanced nations. Great Britain and Australia modified their laws in the 1980s to prevent so-called birth tourism and demanded that a parent had to be a citizen or constant residents so that a newborn had qualified for citizenship.
Overall, it is estimated by various monuments that millions of people who currently live in the USA are regarded as non -authorized immigrantsAnd many from this group had their own children. The problem has been reported with reports that are born in the USA were part of at least one deportation From a family to Honduras – and raises the question of whether these children would have the right to citizenship if they returned to the USA in the future.
Deportations
Almost a third of the total number of cases contains problems in connection with immigration, whereby questions have been raised whether many US residents have been provided with a proper procedure before deporting.
The Supreme Court of the United States on April 19 temporarily banned Trump’s management from the deportation of Venezuelan men in immigration, after their lawyers had announced the risk of a distance without the judicial review previously required by the judges.
The democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen met directly with a man from Maryland who was wrongly deported to El Salvador because he suspected that he was in the violent MS-13 gang. Despite the Federal Court, the Trump government refuses to bring it back.
Three federal judges then criticized the administration’s approach to immigration – and temporarily hired new deportations in their court districts, which were made with the expansion of the enemies, a law from 1798 that was historically only used in times of war that Trump called as justification for removal of certain people without hearings. One of the judges who monitored the case of Abego Garcia, the Salvadoranian man who had recognized the government in Maryland, was wrongly deported to El Salvador, the government stalled that he was trying to avoid an order that blocked additional shifts and misleaded the court about its actions.
The federal judges have issued at least 19 commands to have the ability of the administration to carry out or punish mass shifts of gaining at least nine decisions: In cases in which the judges hold the government, immigration stayed, send certain Häds in Häden in the US Naval -Basis, into the immigration and sent certain Häden into the US -NAVAL.
The immigration authorities have also imprisoned a number of young adults born abroad who have student visa with the obvious intention to deport them. Lawyers of several students claim that the administration violates the first change because they say that the students are honored for earlier pro-Palestinian or anti-Israeli statements or protest activities. In several cases, there were also legal objections to a proper procedure, since the students were removed to several countries where they lived.
The Trump administration deported more than 200 immigrants by lying a measure of war measures on the law on the Alien enemies – they claimed that they were members of Tren de Aragua, a Venezolan gang. Andrew Chang explains how Trump interprets the language of the Law of 1798 to avoid the standard immigration court system, and why experts say it is a slippery slope.
Government expenditure
The administration was in their efforts to reduce and redesign the government by its government of government efficiency (Doge) and redesigned by the billionaire Trump Ally Elon Musk. Several judges had instructed that thousands of dismissed federal workers will be rejected after it was found that their dismissals were probably illegal, but appeal courts remained later.
While some judges have excluded Doge from access to federal databases, others have enabled him to search agencies for possible savings.
Transgender rights
The administration asked the Supreme Court on April 24, to enable Trump’s executive regulation to be implemented, the transgender people from the US military, a number of Trump guidelines to contain transgender rights.
Several judges have blocked his military ban and his policy for the accommodation of inmates into federal prisons that correspond to their birth -sex, and have blocked the restriction of the gender transfer for people under the age of 19.
There were several too legal challenges After the Trump administration had canceled a variety of grants For studies related to transgender health. The Argue That the National Institutes of Health exceeded the legal authority and arbitrarily acted by canceling grants that did not provide adequate explanations on how these studies fell under their standards for scientific research.
US President Donald Trump marked the first 100 days of his second term with a large rally in Michigan, where supporters who were known as “car workers for Trump” made shots in Canada and approved the tariffs for Canadian cars.
Customs and trade
The administration looks like at least seven lawsuits that question Trump’s comprehensive tariffs against foreign trading partners.
They are guided by legal measures from several states, which are led by democratic governors. In a lawsuit, 12 states have joined togetherpreceded by a similar challenge from California alone.
The suits accuse Trump of having exceeded his authority after the constitution by imposing the obligations without the approval of the congress. It is also argued that a president can only call up the law on international emergency management powers – which Trump has for tariffs – when an emergency represents an “unusual and extraordinary threat” from abroad. There is currently no such scenario, the lawsuits argue.
Other cases
For the time being, four judges have blocked Trump’s criminal regulations that limit four large law firms and consider the guidelines as likely retaliation for the speech for the speech by the first change in the constitution.
A judge last week said that the The administration acted illegally About an executive order that aimed to close the state -operated Outlets Voice of America and Radio Free Europe, which was founded decades ago in order to exclude unvarnished reporting to people in authoritarian countries. He ordered the administration to reopen the financing of the outlets.
The Trump government is fighting New York City for the legality of its recently issued driving fees for Manhattan. Recently lawyers of the federal government an internal memo accidentally submitted in court That seemed to argue against his own position.
