Doordash has asked a California Supreme Court judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Uber charging the food delivery company of engulfed competition while afraid of restaurant owners in exclusive agreements.
Dobordash argues in his movement that Uber’s claim lacks merit on all fronts. In a post on her website on Friday, Dobordash said, “The lawsuit is nothing but a cynical and scary tactic from an irritated competitor seeking to avoid true competition. Disappointing behavior from a company once known for competition in its products and innovation.”
In her post, Dobordash added that she will strongly defend “himself and position the company as” fierce but fairly to give tremendous value to traders “.
The hearing is scheduled for July 11 at the California Supreme Court in San Francisco County.
Uber filed her lawsuit against Dobordash in February. The journey giant claimed to do the doordash, which holds most of the food distribution market in the US, threatens restaurants with multimillion dollars or removing or dismantling the position of businesses in the Doordash app.
Uber responded to the Dobordash request in a statement sent to Techcrunch.
“It looks like the team in Doordash is finding it difficult to understand the content of our complaint,” Uber’s statement said in a statement. “When restaurants are forced to choose between unfair conditions or revenge, this is not competition – it is coercion. Uber will continue to stand for traders and for a playing field. We look forward to presenting the facts in court.”
Uber requested a jury judgment in his original complaint. The company did not specify the amount of damage it is looking for.
Separately, Dreamoo confirmed on Friday that Doordash offered to buy the European food delivery company for $ 3.6 billion.
